<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Is Time to Believe Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trupolitics.net/2009/02/23/it-is-time-to-believe-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trupolitics.net/2009/02/23/it-is-time-to-believe-again/</link>
	<description>Only the most important political issues. Just the facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick V.</title>
		<link>http://trupolitics.net/2009/02/23/it-is-time-to-believe-again/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick V.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trupolitics.net/?p=149#comment-79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outstanding article! This is what I believe, but did not have the writing ability to put it into words. Thank you for sending this out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding article! This is what I believe, but did not have the writing ability to put it into words. Thank you for sending this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://trupolitics.net/2009/02/23/it-is-time-to-believe-again/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trupolitics.net/?p=149#comment-78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very well written article. If you have not already done so I would encourage you to send a copy to our president and every member of congress. In so many words what you are saying is we have become a nation lacking strong leadership. We the people have to instill leadership in a government lacking it. 

We on the conservative side have to be carefull not to pass the blame ourselves. Remember the doom and gloom approach to the eceonimic situation that came out of the last administration and the then presiding congress. Remember the fear mongering approach to justify a war. I could go on but the important thing is to take responsibility even if our political leaders don&#039;t. We can make a difference if we stay active and vocal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well written article. If you have not already done so I would encourage you to send a copy to our president and every member of congress. In so many words what you are saying is we have become a nation lacking strong leadership. We the people have to instill leadership in a government lacking it. </p>
<p>We on the conservative side have to be carefull not to pass the blame ourselves. Remember the doom and gloom approach to the eceonimic situation that came out of the last administration and the then presiding congress. Remember the fear mongering approach to justify a war. I could go on but the important thing is to take responsibility even if our political leaders don&#8217;t. We can make a difference if we stay active and vocal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revere</title>
		<link>http://trupolitics.net/2009/02/23/it-is-time-to-believe-again/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Revere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trupolitics.net/?p=149#comment-38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep up the excellent articles! This one gets to the core issue of personal responsibility vs. government handouts, which ultimately lead to government control of our lives. Has our government been perfect over the last few years? No, of course not. However, it has not been a government of true conservatism either--principles you espouse in your article. Will we be better off by going 180 degrees in the opposite direction? That is an absurd not supported by at least 50% of our citizens. Only one example is below, an article from Larry Kudlow on the ECONOMICS of the &quot;new deal&quot;. I am very concerned about what I see as a coming backlash in our country. 

Obama Declares War on Investors, Entrepreneurs, Businesses, And More
Friday, 27 Feb 2009 &#124; 4:39 PM ET

Posted By: Larry Kudlow
Anchor

President Barack Obama
AP
President Barack Obama
Let me be very clear on the economics of President Obama’s State of the Union speech and his budget.

He is declaring war on investors, entrepreneurs, small businesses, large corporations, and private-equity and venture-capital funds.

That is the meaning of his anti-growth tax-hike proposals, which make absolutely no sense at all — either for this recession or from the standpoint of expanding our economy’s long-run potential to grow.

Raising the marginal tax rate on successful earners, capital, dividends, and all the private funds is a function of Obama’s left-wing social vision, and a repudiation of his economic-recovery statements. Ditto for his sweeping government-planning-and-spending program, which will wind up raising federal outlays as a share of GDP to at least 30 percent, if not more, over the next 10 years.

This is nearly double the government-spending low-point reached during the late 1990s by the Gingrich Congress and the Clinton administration. While not quite as high as spending levels in Western Europe, we regrettably will be gaining on this statist-planning approach.

Study after study over the past several decades has shown how countries that spend more produce less, while nations that tax less produce more. Obama is doing it wrong on both counts.

And as far as middle-class tax cuts are concerned, Obama’s cap-and-trade program will be a huge across-the-board tax increase on blue-collar workers, including unionized workers. Industrial production is plunging, but new carbon taxes will prevent production from ever recovering. While the country wants more fuel and power, cap-and-trade will deliver less.

The tax hikes will generate lower growth and fewer revenues. Yes, the economy will recover. But Obama’s rosy scenario of 4 percent recovery growth in the out years of his budget is not likely to occur. The combination of easy money from the Fed and below-potential economic growth is a prescription for stagflation. That’s one of the messages of the falling stock market.

Essentially, the Obama economic policies represent a major Democratic party relapse into Great Society social spending and taxing. It is a return to the LBJ/Nixon era, and a move away from the Reagan/Clinton period. House Republicans, fortunately, are 90 days sober, as they are putting up a valiant fight to stop the big-government onslaught and move the GOP back to first principles.

Noteworthy up here on Wall Street, a great many Obama supporters — especially hedge-fund types who voted for “change” — are becoming disillusioned with the performances of Obama and Treasury man Geithner.

There is a growing sense of buyer’s remorse.

Well then, do conservatives dare say: We told you so?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the excellent articles! This one gets to the core issue of personal responsibility vs. government handouts, which ultimately lead to government control of our lives. Has our government been perfect over the last few years? No, of course not. However, it has not been a government of true conservatism either&#8211;principles you espouse in your article. Will we be better off by going 180 degrees in the opposite direction? That is an absurd not supported by at least 50% of our citizens. Only one example is below, an article from Larry Kudlow on the ECONOMICS of the &#8220;new deal&#8221;. I am very concerned about what I see as a coming backlash in our country. </p>
<p>Obama Declares War on Investors, Entrepreneurs, Businesses, And More<br />
Friday, 27 Feb 2009 | 4:39 PM ET</p>
<p>Posted By: Larry Kudlow<br />
Anchor</p>
<p>President Barack Obama<br />
AP<br />
President Barack Obama<br />
Let me be very clear on the economics of President Obama’s State of the Union speech and his budget.</p>
<p>He is declaring war on investors, entrepreneurs, small businesses, large corporations, and private-equity and venture-capital funds.</p>
<p>That is the meaning of his anti-growth tax-hike proposals, which make absolutely no sense at all — either for this recession or from the standpoint of expanding our economy’s long-run potential to grow.</p>
<p>Raising the marginal tax rate on successful earners, capital, dividends, and all the private funds is a function of Obama’s left-wing social vision, and a repudiation of his economic-recovery statements. Ditto for his sweeping government-planning-and-spending program, which will wind up raising federal outlays as a share of GDP to at least 30 percent, if not more, over the next 10 years.</p>
<p>This is nearly double the government-spending low-point reached during the late 1990s by the Gingrich Congress and the Clinton administration. While not quite as high as spending levels in Western Europe, we regrettably will be gaining on this statist-planning approach.</p>
<p>Study after study over the past several decades has shown how countries that spend more produce less, while nations that tax less produce more. Obama is doing it wrong on both counts.</p>
<p>And as far as middle-class tax cuts are concerned, Obama’s cap-and-trade program will be a huge across-the-board tax increase on blue-collar workers, including unionized workers. Industrial production is plunging, but new carbon taxes will prevent production from ever recovering. While the country wants more fuel and power, cap-and-trade will deliver less.</p>
<p>The tax hikes will generate lower growth and fewer revenues. Yes, the economy will recover. But Obama’s rosy scenario of 4 percent recovery growth in the out years of his budget is not likely to occur. The combination of easy money from the Fed and below-potential economic growth is a prescription for stagflation. That’s one of the messages of the falling stock market.</p>
<p>Essentially, the Obama economic policies represent a major Democratic party relapse into Great Society social spending and taxing. It is a return to the LBJ/Nixon era, and a move away from the Reagan/Clinton period. House Republicans, fortunately, are 90 days sober, as they are putting up a valiant fight to stop the big-government onslaught and move the GOP back to first principles.</p>
<p>Noteworthy up here on Wall Street, a great many Obama supporters — especially hedge-fund types who voted for “change” — are becoming disillusioned with the performances of Obama and Treasury man Geithner.</p>
<p>There is a growing sense of buyer’s remorse.</p>
<p>Well then, do conservatives dare say: We told you so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ender</title>
		<link>http://trupolitics.net/2009/02/23/it-is-time-to-believe-again/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trupolitics.net/?p=149#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it funny that liberalism assumes all people are good, but places more power in the hands of the elites.  Whereas conservatism, which acknowledges the weaknesses of mankind, promotes a system where the individual is allowed to prosper and become the revolutionaries, entrepeneurs and dreamers you write about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it funny that liberalism assumes all people are good, but places more power in the hands of the elites.  Whereas conservatism, which acknowledges the weaknesses of mankind, promotes a system where the individual is allowed to prosper and become the revolutionaries, entrepeneurs and dreamers you write about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMadison</title>
		<link>http://trupolitics.net/2009/02/23/it-is-time-to-believe-again/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMadison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trupolitics.net/?p=149#comment-32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an extremely important post that should be passed on. I only wish we had the leadership to restore faith in the people. If we don&#039;t act soon and unite in one voice, we may be too far gone into socialism to recover. Let&#039;s spread the word.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an extremely important post that should be passed on. I only wish we had the leadership to restore faith in the people. If we don&#8217;t act soon and unite in one voice, we may be too far gone into socialism to recover. Let&#8217;s spread the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://trupolitics.net/2009/02/23/it-is-time-to-believe-again/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trupolitics.net/?p=149#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;Don&#039;t Tread On Me&quot; flag is an interesting addition. I believe it was first carried by George Washington during the War for Independence. The original snake had 13 rings to its rattle, symbolizing the 13 colonies. But the reason they carried was to say, We&#039;re warning you not to mess with us, but if you don&#039;t listen we&#039;re dangerous and ready to strike. Just like a rattle snake that says &quot;I&#039;m here&quot; by shaking it&#039;s rattle, and warning of it&#039;s presence before it strikes, the founders that it would be wrong to strike first, and felt that they needed to warn the British that they would indeed strike if the British didn&#039;t steer clear.

A lot of people today are talking about this flag and the possibility of a new revolution to restore the constitution, in fact Glenn Beck has it on his website but the snake has 11 rings to signify 11 principles the founders held, and the need to get back to them. Interestingly he is saying a revolution would be a horrible idea and could turn out like the French Revolution.

Just thought you all might be interested in the history of that flag if you didn&#039;t know it already, and hopefully I got it all right and did it justice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Don&#8217;t Tread On Me&#8221; flag is an interesting addition. I believe it was first carried by George Washington during the War for Independence. The original snake had 13 rings to its rattle, symbolizing the 13 colonies. But the reason they carried was to say, We&#8217;re warning you not to mess with us, but if you don&#8217;t listen we&#8217;re dangerous and ready to strike. Just like a rattle snake that says &#8220;I&#8217;m here&#8221; by shaking it&#8217;s rattle, and warning of it&#8217;s presence before it strikes, the founders that it would be wrong to strike first, and felt that they needed to warn the British that they would indeed strike if the British didn&#8217;t steer clear.</p>
<p>A lot of people today are talking about this flag and the possibility of a new revolution to restore the constitution, in fact Glenn Beck has it on his website but the snake has 11 rings to signify 11 principles the founders held, and the need to get back to them. Interestingly he is saying a revolution would be a horrible idea and could turn out like the French Revolution.</p>
<p>Just thought you all might be interested in the history of that flag if you didn&#8217;t know it already, and hopefully I got it all right and did it justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://trupolitics.net/2009/02/23/it-is-time-to-believe-again/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trupolitics.net/?p=149#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article man!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

