Independence Day
July 15, 2010 2 Comments
This article was featured in The Bulletin (Philadelphia-area newspaper) on 7/19/10. You can read the online newspaper version here or catch the print column every other week.
During our final meeting before the Fourth of July, our Board of Supervisors (the local governing body in Newtown Township, PA for which I serve as Vice-Chairman) was faced with a difficult and emotional decision: Should we fund fireworks for our community in the face of a bleak financial outlook? Celebrating our nation’s independence with fireworks is a time-honored tradition in Newtown, but escalating costs and declining revenues meant we had to make tough budgetary choices. So, do you jeopardize a key community event in favor of fiscal responsibility, or fund the fireworks and risk a future tax hike?
Moments like this occur often in local politics. Unlike the federal government, municipalities can’t print money, issue endless mountains of debt, or finish the year in the red. The mandate is clear: Balance the budget or go bankrupt. As such, local officials must constantly face the harsh reality of either reduced services or higher taxes. There is little alternative.
However difficult, such forced balance can be a beautiful blessing in disguise. We cannot pass debt onto future generations, leaving fiscal responsibility to our successors, or delay tough decisions in favor of political pandering. We cannot say “yes” to every request, or promise voters a utopia and spend others’ money to pay for it. A local leader’s philosophy on the role of government is constantly tested.
This was one such moment. The night prior, in a Financial Planning Committee meeting, we told our police chief to reduce his request for video monitoring equipment, and asked our technology head to pare back important operational software requests. Were fireworks more important than public safety or administrative efficiency?
As our board meeting progressed, I felt anxiety over the decision. I thought, “Do we want to be the ones that take away fireworks for hundreds, if not thousands of residents? Do we want to break a revered tradition and send our residents to other municipalities (or worse, New Jersey!) for the Fourth?” I’d campaigned on strict fiscal discipline, low taxes, and constrained spending, but since taking office I’d also learned the acute human impact of each of our decisions.
Then it hit me: What day were we celebrating? Independence Day. The day our country declared its separation from overbearing government, affirmed its unwavering defense of liberty, and sought a new nation bred of individual freedom and responsibility. Who were we to spend others’ money?
Independence, in many ways, means the freedom to choose. Any dollar government spends is a dollar taken from its citizens, and when that occurs, government has made a choice. By spending our residents’ money on fireworks, therefore, we were deciding how their hard earned money would be spent. In trying economic times, perhaps they would be willing to forgo fireworks. Perhaps they would prefer to save that money to meet rent, save for a home, or buy a car. Why not let them decide?
For Independence Day, the decision was clear: If the community wanted fireworks, let’s come together and make it happen. No government, no bureaucrats, no administrators legislating choice. But a community of private citizens committed to honoring tradition, history, and Independence, willing to donate to a worthy cause.
A few nights later, as I sat with my family and watched the fireworks light up the sky in Newtown, I smiled knowing our community had met the challenge. Volunteer and private organizations had come together to raise funds, and the fireworks were magnificent. Government got out of the way, and let Independence ring.
Everyday, our leaders are faced with similar decisions. Many might seem small—the fireworks represented about .01% of our annual budget—but every decision to defend liberty is invaluable. Liberty enables communities to come together, individuals to succeed, and societies to pursue prosperity. It is a fundamental human right, unalienable and foundational to our nation’s exceptional success. Too often, however, our leaders forget the creeping pull of government control. They forget that government is not a self-sustaining entity; it is funded directly by citizens. They forget that government action does not occur in a vacuum; it replaces individual choice and responsibility. They forget that as government grows, liberty shrinks.
That is why, as we begin to head into election season, it is every citizen’s responsibility to champion small government and freedom. Let our actions tear to shreds empty rhetoric and false promises. This Fourth of July, we decided that Independence is best honored not by fireworks, but by Liberty.
-Matt Benchener is Supervisor of Newtown Township and Founder of TruPolitics.net

I like the article and it got me thinking, so good work I guess (also what’s up with the NJ comment! rude, everybody knows NJ is awesome). You say though in the article, who were we to spend others’ money? Isn’t that exactly your job? Now I understand you should be responsible and don’t disagree with your decision to not have fireworks, but you were elected to spend their money. So the fireworks were .01% of the budget, what about the other 99.99%? This is why I never bought the ‘government is taking away our freedoms’ by spending our money. It seems the difference between amazing individual freedom and horrible government tyranny is quite slim. Ok so you let the people chose on this one, what about the the town pool? community programs? school programs? the library? I’m sure part of the budget goes towards funding the school’s baseball team …. shouldn’t you let the people decide where their hard earned money is spent? If you did, I bet there wouldn’t be a soccer team (did you watch the World Cup! it was awful). But in my mind, thats not how it should work.
Dan, as always, thanks for keeping us on our toes. I think you make my point exactly. To most conservatives (and to me), government shouldn’t spend on anything that it doesn’t have to. In most cases, the decision of what that encompasses is determined by what you feel is the proper role of government.
Many liberal thinkers (including our current president) believe that government should provide for the less fortunate, balance out society, and provide a base quality of life for all. So, they are comfortable spending on universal healthcare, welfare, food stamps, etc. Conservatives, by contrast, believe government should stick to its core functions that, arguably, cannot and will not be provided by private citizens: National defense; enforcing the rule of law; key systems used by the public (roads; water; etc.); regulation of the market (like an umpire in a baseball game—this allows for fair competition; on this point, by the way, libertarians would disagree with most conservatives); etc. That’s why we have a Constitution; our Founders knew we had to keep government reigned in or else it would grow. Again, to the point I make often on this site, when government spends, it spends your money. When it does that, it chooses for you what is important. When that happens, your liberty is gone.
So, to your examples above, we don’t have a town pool, nor do we fund the baseball team, or library (all school funding is through our school board, which is a separate governmental body; here, we could have another whole discussion about public schools; honestly, I’m not sure where I stand on schools yet, though I’m compelled by vouchers/school choice). We do have community programs, but I personally believe we should drastically reduce or eliminate those. Why should government be paying for someone’s child to take a dance class or cooking class? Why can’t that child’s parents pay for it themselves?
In other words, you are not restricting someone’s liberty by spending in general, only when that spending is unnecessary or outside of Constitutional limits. Government should stick only to core government functions. Fireworks are not a core government function. In local government, I run across these decisions all the time, and it is certainly less black and white than it may seem. There are many things I question, and each decision is tough. But, I try to stick to core functions of government. My fellow Supervisors do a nice job as well, and we run a pretty lean budget.
And finally, my NJ comment was just a joke! It’ll probably be edited out in the newspaper version, but who knows. But, I do appreciate you defending your home state.